Friday, May 1, 2015

Celebrity Worship: Conforming Under Charismatic Clowns

As a man born in nineteen eighty-seven, many could say that I grew up during an exciting time.  As a child I grew up during the evolution of the computer, the coming of the pager/cellphone, and the developments of musical/video distribution. I have watched music and television format transform from cassette, to CD/DVD, all the way into digital format.  As a child of eight I can remember rolling around on my bedroom floor, shredding my air guitar while blaring Bruce Springsteen’s “Born in the USA” on cassette, completely unaware of the hidden political messages within.  Later, at the impressionable age of twelve, I would be one of the first to own the album No Strings Attached by NSync as described by Chris Anderson in our text (494). Finally, at the age of fourteen my brother, who was away at college, explained to me over AOL Instant Messenger how to download music off the internet and play it on our “impressive” ten gigabyte hard-drive computer.  Since then laws against music sharing have been put into effect, but music sharing still happens. People still purchase music but much more often in digital format. However, while I feel I grew to appreciate technology and its advancements from an intellectual standpoint, the majority of my peers have become hell bent on using modern technology for keeping up to date on the tween-twerking tweets of the celebrity world. To say that I am disgusted by society’s contemporary pop culture obsession would be an understatement. Still, one must ask the question: Why did we end up here? What changed in humankind that made so many drop their goals of becoming successful in a work environment and opt for the subpar achievement of getting drunk on an international reality show? Why do people live vicariously through celebrities exploits? The answer isn’t a simple one and not one that can be completely answered in a brief essay. However, I believe a large part of it has to do with social norms / conformance, charismatic authority, and technology. We as human beings strive to feel a sense of belonging and desire to be like people we admire. This has been true for almost our entire existence.
            One could trace celebrity admiration back to our Neanderthal heritage.  Undoubtedly our species has always had at least a mild obsession with whom we view as alpha characters within society.  The want and desire for power and respect for leaders has always existed on some sort of level. Overtime mankind evolved and monarchal hierarchies were put into place to establish power, and law. Gossip unquestionably came along and reinforced social connections amongst individuals especially at lower positions within society. In the text book Sociology A Brief Introduction Richard T. Schaefer brings to light another form of authority hypothesized by Max Weber that describes celebrity obsession: charismatic authority. He explains: “The term charismatic authority refers to power made legitimate by a leader’s exceptional personal or emotional appeal to his or her followers” (367).  In essence they garner power through inspiration. Society has had many people throughout history that have furthered our way of thinking by taking on a charismatic authoritative role.  Without people like General George Washington, John Adams, Fredrick Douglas, John D. Rockefeller, Andrew Carnegie, Henry Ford, Martin Luther King Jr., Steve Jobs, or Bill Gates we would not be the society we are today. All of these people are fantastic examples of authority garnered through charisma. While their intentions may not all have always been pure, they essentially built America and shaped ideals and beliefs that we still have today. However, this change happened at a much slower pace due to their lack of technology.  Messages and beliefs couldn’t reach the masses as quickly as they would today.
            In today’s American society you can find almost anyone’s thoughts, values, or beliefs in a matter of a few seconds.  The entire world is connected via a massive web of networks we call the internet.  Due to almost everyone’s feelings of self-importance I find that I am constantly forced to sift through the countless memes and word vomit that plagues web pages everywhere. It seems as if everyone has an opinion, and they cannot wait to defecate it on their social networking site.  I suppose I cannot be overly harsh on my peers though since I own a minority outlook on the situation.  They are after all adhering to their preprogrammed social norms. Jeffery S. Nevid describes social norms in his textbook Psychology Concepts and Applications. He draws on research conducted by Steven Gaulin and Donald McBurney that states “Social norms prescribe behavior that are expected of people in social situations” (533).  In his example he explains, “People are more likely to make a charitable donation when they are asked to do so by a coworker in full view of others than when they receive an appeal in the mail in the privacy of their own homes” (533). Let’s digest this for a moment. Essentially that means you are much more likely to adhere to social norms when in a room of a handful of your coworkers.  Let’s now take that same situation and apply it to social media, a forum where hundreds, maybe even thousands of your acquaintances and friends can interact with your thoughts and have influence on your actions.  It’s no wonder millions of conformists misinform the masses every day with heartfelt fallacies that instruct their readers to re-share or re-blog their fabricated messages. This same science applies to interests within pop culture.  Going back to my hypothesis on the evolution of gossip, what better forum to excrete the irrelevant happenings of modern pop culture celebrities than the internet?    We can now even link directly into the celebrities’ day to day activities by following them on social networking sites like Facebook and Twitter.  If George Washington were able to tweet the masses about his victory at Yorktown I am sure he would have. Who knows, maybe King George would have even responded with a derogatory comment. Instead we are blessed today with celebrities’ thoughts (many of which, in my opinion are ignorant) on life, love, fashion, and how to be a “better” person. We get to see low quality images of their lunch, with a quirky quote about how they should start serving pizza at church on Sundays instead of some crumby wafer to increase Christianity beliefs. If they offend someone with their obtuse web posts it isn’t a big deal since they can apologize immediately with another web post to their addicted conformist followers. While this may be a far-fetched example, almost anyone can recall reading about some celebrity that offers a formal apology for something they have said. 
            When you link it all together it makes complete sense. It is because of the culmination of charismatic authority, conforming to social norms, and the advancements in technology that people follow celebrities with such vigorous passion. The people of America used to be influenced more so by their parents, religion, and education. As technology grew it started to corner a market in the education industry and even the entertainment industry. People began to use computers for everything from work to play. For some individuals it became their sole existence. Their new methods for learning the things they care come from watching television, and listening to music. In turn they become hooked on the people making the music, and starring in these television broadcasts. They want to become these people. They want to feel that role of being an alpha person in society. They watch The Kardashians, and follow people like Kanye West to deal with their own inadequacies of not becoming a charismatically authoritative person. To reinforce this behavior they adhere to social norms. As they see what their friends conform to and believe they too follow suit.  This behavior is a psychological and sociological format that is the byproduct of thousands of years of evolution and advancement. Unfortunately I view modern celebrity obsession to be a regression of society.
            I feel it is acceptable to have role models even if your role model is someone that you have never met, or will ever meet. Role models give us a starting point. They shape who we want to be and what we want to become.  In some cases, they even grant us guidance on the career paths we want to take.  My issue with society’s obsession with modern celebrities is moralistic. I think many pop culture celebrities reinforce nonproductive behavior and encourage our youth to fall in love with a sublevel standard of living. Being unprofessional or unproductive is “cool” or “comedic” and breaking laws is a romantic way to live in many of their messages.  People can point out that their personal celebrity icons represent what they believe.  However, I can recall a personal account in which I watched a celebrity debate on a political issue on their reality show. Instead of offering up factual or personal evidence to back their beliefs they just continued to hackle their opponent on their level of intellect by saying something along the lines of “Oh my gawd, you’re just so stupid” over and over again.  In my opinion this celebrity did not know anything at all about the political issue at stake, but rather felt they should use their status as a celebrity to their advantage. How on earth could their opponent ever be in the right on this issue when they have no charismatic authority?  When people use their “holier than thou” celebrity status as a means for argument they abuse their charismatic authority in the same way a tyrant would.  The time has come for us as humans to formulate our own opinions and ideas. If not, I believe America will fall behind as a society.
            In conclusion I think it is important for us all to remember what matters in life.  It is important for us to focus on our similarities and how we have developed overtime. However, it is also important for us to continue to progress our way of thinking. I am not saying that the tweens of today that idolize their pop culture icons cannot one day solve our nation’s problems.  I am saying however, that they will have to develop a new way of thinking, and one that goes beyond a desire to attain international social status. They need to not be afraid of being an individual, and abandon their pop culture conformance way of thinking. I think our thirty-fifth president said it best when he made the statement “Conformity is the jailer of freedom, and the enemy of growth.” Be proud of who you are and what you can do. “Because “Today you are you! That’s truer than true! There is no one alive that’s you-er than you! –Theodor Geisel
                                                                            Works Cited
.
Anderson, Chris. “The Rise and Fall of the Hit.” The Bedford Reader. Ed. X. J. Kennedy, Dorothy M. Kennedy, and Jane E. Aaron. 11th ed. Boston: Bedford, 2012. 494. Print.
Nevid, Jeffery S. Psychology Concepts and Applications. Belmont: Wadsworth, 2013. 533.          Print.

Schaefer, Richard T. Sociology a Brief Introduction. 9th ed. New York: Mcgraw-Hill, 2011.           367. Print.

No comments:

Post a Comment